What's the use? What's the logic behind such decision? In what book is it stated that making a film with thought-provoking reflections, either metaphysical, earthly or heartwarming, and continuing it with a "comedic" international espionage twist is supposed to contribute ANYTHING to the story? I would only justify such attempt with independent or renowned filmmakers, as was the case of Hal Hartley, but we are talking about Pixar here, a company focused at making trascendental 3D-animated films aimed at all types of audiences. And it suffers from exactly the same f***ing syndrome: an illusion of international espionage parody. I saw Cars 2 for the first time exactly one week after watching Hal Hartley's sequel to Henry Fool, called Fay Grim. What a bizarre turn of bizarre events that came straight out from Bizarro world. Jesus Christ, it reminds me of Fay Grim (2006).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |